Higher-quality respondents, finally verifiable, not just claimed.

Marketplaces and most panels route anonymous traffic into your screener and filter after the click — you never know whether a panelist was properly profiled or just pushed through a pre-screener tuned to qualify. We only recontact panelists we already know — profiled, quality-checked, and matched to your study before any invitation goes out — and we show you the evidence behind each one. The result: higher quality and higher incidence, from the same suppliers underneath. A smarter order of operations.

Agreed — every supplier says it. That's why we don't ask you to believe us: run a pilot alongside your current supplier, same study, a slice of the sample, verdict metrics agreed upfront. The fieldwork analysis decides, not the pitch.

Your data gets quietly distorted. Respondents who learned to game screeners answer as whoever qualifies — segments get polluted, incidence reads wrong, and the business decisions built on that data don't maximize the outcomes they were supposed to. It's not even always malicious: panelists get terminated so often that misrepresenting becomes rational. Our model removes that incentive — the panelists we recontact were profiled with open-ended questions long before your study existed, and they're only invited when their real profile matches.

From panel suppliers we've tested for quality, through permissioned partnerships. Panelists opt into profiling with explicit consent, answer open-ended AI-assisted questions, and pass a cleaning layer before entering the pool — 61% make it through. We'd rather be conservative than pad the pool.

That's the mechanism the model rests on, so we measure it. In our latest recontact test, 69% of panelists profiled four months earlier completed a new survey within about a week, at a normal incentive, with quality holding. One cohort, one supplier — we treat it as an upper bound, and we keep measuring.

A feasibility answer on a live brief, delivered within 24 hours as an interactive page: who we'd recontact, the evidence behind each match, a confident floor per target — matched × recontact rate × incidence, with the math shown — and transparent pricing. It's free, and you're billed only for delivered completes.

The after-fieldwork deliverable on every project: incidence, disqualification rate, completion, drop-off — and who qualified and why, per source. It's built to be forwarded: your client sees the same provenance you do. And because every study reports the same metrics the same way, you can compare our performance against your other suppliers on facts, not impressions.

The quote answers that in 24 hours, with evidence — and when the answer is no, you hear it fast. When we're thin on a cell, the quote says so, and you choose: Enlightn-vetted panelists only, or full coverage where the gap is filled from external partner sources, labeled and priced separately. Nothing is blended without you seeing it.

We're a premium sample provider, with real costs behind the quality — AI-assisted profiling, AI-powered data cleaning, fraud detection. Our approach also produces much higher incidence rates, which pulls our variable costs down. All in, expect a CPI about 20–30% higher than what you're used to. When we need external providers to cover a gap — always transparently, with your prior approval — we apply a margin on top of our real costs, much lower than our competitors', and disclosed.

We're focusing on consumer surveys, and working with suppliers focused on consumer acquisition. That said, two-thirds of our profiled panelists are in the active population, so we can fulfill B2B projects. Send us the brief and we'll answer transparently.